Show simple item record

dc.contributorceronike@muohio.eduen_US
dc.contributor.advisorJohnson, Kathleenen_US
dc.contributor.advisorArmitage, Kevinen_US
dc.contributor.authorCeronie, Katelinen_US
dc.date2012-04-20en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-23T14:47:05Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-15T13:27:09Z
dc.date.available2012-04-23T14:47:05Zen_US
dc.date.available2014-04-15T13:27:09Z
dc.date.issued2012-04-23en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2374.MDLC/12065en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2374.MDLC/12065
dc.description.abstractThe interest for this thesis stemmed from existing critical discussions of the difference between the landscapes demarcated by the words “wilderness” and “wildness.” For example, in Walden, Henry David Thoreau pointedly uses the word “wild,” rather than “wilderness” to describe his surroundings at Walden Pond. This sparked critical discussions about the landscape of mid-nineteenth century Massachusetts, and the ways in which that landscape would or would not qualify as “wilderness.” This thesis, then, takes up similar questions: What is the difference between “wildness” and “wilderness?” Can “wilderness” be given a concrete definition, or is the definition always changing based on cultural viewpoints? How do national parks protect “wilderness?” Or, do they even protect “wilderness” at all? The thesis then moves into an interdisciplinary approach toward attempting to understand the American fascination with wilderness and the American relationship with national parks that stems from that fascination. In order to make an attempt at answering these questions, this thesis incorporates three areas of historical research, before bringing all lines of research together into a final argument. The first section looks at the history of “wilderness” as a cultural concept: the development of the word and its connotations in Europe, the ways in which the word was applied to the American landscape as immigrants from Europe settled in North America, and the ways in which the understanding of “wilderness” has changed into an idealized form. The second section considers the history of American national parks, and how tourism has functioned in the process of creating the national parks. Then, the third section examines the government documents that created the National Park Service in 1916, and the ways in which the creation of the National Park Service changed both American national parks and the American “wilderness” ideal. Finally, the last section brings these lines of inquiry together in a study of 1916 issues of the Saturday Evening Post, National Geographic, and Harper’s Weekly, which give insight into the ways in which the American public regarded wilderness and national parks at the time of the establishment of the National Park Service.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofEnglish/Literature (major)en_US
dc.subjectwildernessen_US
dc.subjectAmerican national parksen_US
dc.subjectNational Park Serviceen_US
dc.subjectSaturday Evening Posten_US
dc.subjectNational Geographicen_US
dc.subjectHarper's Weeklyen_US
dc.subjectAtlantic Monthlyen_US
dc.title"Going to the Mountains is Going Home": Constructing Early Twentieth-Century American Wilderness and National Parksen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record