dc.description.abstract | This article examines the impact of catastrophic
hurricane events on income distribution in hurricane
states in the United States. Media claims have been
made and the perception created that the most damaging
impact of hurricanes is on the lowest income population in
the affected states. If these claims are true, they may have
serious implications for the insurance industry and government
policy makers. We develop a panel data, fixed
effects econometric model that includes hurricane-impacted
states as cross-sections using annual data for a period of
almost 100 years. The Gini coefficient is used as a measure
of income inequality, and is a function of normalized
hurricane economic damages, gross domestic product
(GDP), a set of socioeconomic variables that serves as a
control, time trend, and cross-sectional dummy variables.
Findings indicate that for every 100 billion US dollars in
hurricane economic damages there is an increase in income
inequality by 5.4 % as measured by Gini coefficient.
Political, sociodemographic, and economic variables are
also significant. These include such variables as the political
party controlling the U.S. Senate, the proportion of
nonwhite population by state, and GDP. Time trend is a
positive and significant variable, suggesting an increase in
income inequality over time. There are significant differences
among the states included in the study. Our results
demonstrate that different segments of the population are
differently impacted by hurricanes and suggest how that
differential impact could be considered in future government
policies and business decisions, particularly those
made by the insurance industry. | en_US |