dc.contributor.author | Timm, Robert M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Richard E. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-02-22T21:27:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-02-22T21:27:45Z | |
dc.identifier.other | Timm, R. M., & Lee, R. E. (1981). Do bot flies, Cuterebra (Diptera: Cuterebridae), emasculate their hosts?. Journal of medical entomology, 18(4), 333-336. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5859 | |
dc.description.abstract | Asa Fitch, in his description of a new species of
Cuterebra that he named, "emasculator," was the first to suggest
that bot flies castrated their mammalian hosts. In recent years
several major review papers and parasitology texts have continued
to perpetuate this belief. A review of both the literature on
bot flies and their hosts and of the life cycles of both bots and
hosts provides no evidence to substantiate castration. Eastern
Chipmunks (Tamias striatus) experimentally infected with Cuterebra
ernasculator experienced no destruction of testicular tissue.
The concept of castration may have been perpetuated by
observations of bots in the scotal sac of a host. Superficial examination
of a host with a bot(s) in the scrotum would suggest
that the bot had consumed the testis; this is demonstrated on
a White-footed Mouse (Peromyscus leucopus). We conclude that
there is no evidence to support the notion that bot flies castrate
their mammalian hosts. On extremely rare occasions, a bot may
slightly displace a testis, and perhaps this temporarily reduces fertility. | en_US |
dc.title | Do bot flies, Cuterebra (Diptera: Cuterebridae), emasculate their hosts? | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
dc.date.published | 1981-07-31 | |