Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSprimplin, Aaron
dc.contributor.authorRevelle, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorHurst, Susan
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-26T20:23:26Z
dc.date.available2014-03-26T20:23:26Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-26
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5037
dc.description.abstractLibraries, particularly academic libraries, are swimming in a sea of data. Librarians often contribute to this by counting every possible patron interaction in an attempt to both define their current situation and to predict future staffing, budgetary, and collection needs. This investigation assessed the effectiveness of using various data sources in predicting future library activity and needs. The authors collected data on in-person and chat reference transactions, electronic journal downloads, database queries, and catalog searches from 2009–12. By analyzing these data points, the authors hypothesized they would find correlations that might be predictive of changes in related library services. Results indicated that the strongest correlations track activity over the course of the academic calendar. While none of the data points examined had predictive properties, the strong correlations between the data points over the period of time studied indicated that any one of them might serve as a stand-alone indicator of usage.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.titleSeeing the Forest by Counting the Trees [slide deck]en_US
dc.typeConference Presentationen_US
dc.date.published2012-10-04
dc.relation.journalLITA National Forumen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States